Page 1 of 1

monsterr sj now two

Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 9:41 pm
by turbo-tom

Click Here for Ebay Listing


double chassis though :yuk: :yuk:



Click Here for Ebay Listing

Re: monsterr sj

Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 9:50 pm
by dan_2k_uk
Bet they dont get anywhere near to what that will have cost to build.

Must have been a fair bit of time.

Re: monsterr sj

Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 5:34 pm
by trotter
is a chassis on a chassis even legal?? and why would that thing ever need a snorkel ffs! hahaha

Re: monsterr sj

Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 5:53 pm
by turbo-tom
trotter wrote:is a chassis on a chassis even legal??
there was enough of that on another forum cough cough :hahaha:

Re: monsterr sj

Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 6:04 pm
by Edweird
turbo-tom wrote:
trotter wrote:is a chassis on a chassis even legal??
there was enough of that on another forum cough cough :hahaha:
It must be legal, because the Discovery 3 and 4 have a double chassis. That's why they weigh in at over 3 tons/tonnes

Re: monsterr sj

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 12:53 am
by Tramp
Edweird wrote:
turbo-tom wrote:
trotter wrote:is a chassis on a chassis even legal??
there was enough of that on another forum cough cough :hahaha:
It must be legal, because the Discovery 3 and 4 have a double chassis. That's why they weigh in at over 3 tons/tonnes
If "stacking" a chassis doesn't require an SVA I'll trade my SJ for a defender

Re: monsterr sj

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 6:04 pm
by ScottieJ
Edweird wrote:
turbo-tom wrote:
trotter wrote:is a chassis on a chassis even legal??
there was enough of that on another forum cough cough :hahaha:
It must be legal, because the Discovery 3 and 4 have a double chassis. That's why they weigh in at over 3 tons/tonnes
Its not quite the same, coming from the factory with a twin chassis doesn't really compare to welding one chassis on top of another.

Re: monsterr sj

Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 8:30 am
by diamond hell
Tramp wrote: If "stacking" a chassis doesn't require an SVA I'll trade my SJ for a defender
IVA, not SVA these days and even if it did need IVA it's unlikely that the double chassis aspect of things would be the most challenging aspect of the IVA test, as it doesn't have a direct effect on passenger safety (although it could have a major effect on safety in an accident!).

Re: monsterr sj

Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:32 pm
by donkeychomp
Want it. Want it badly.

Re: monsterr sj now two

Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2012 8:34 am
by dan_2k_uk
Not road legal = not intrested!